Re: Packit Pagure support (was: [RFC] Optionally using git repositories instead of the lookaside cache)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2020-04-09 at 12:54 -0400, James Cassell wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020, at 12:33 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 11:41 AM Tomas Tomecek <ttomecek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 4:34 PM Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > We actually are. I assume you're asking about why we're not using
> > > > packit. We're not on GitHub so the service isn't (as far as I can tell)
> > > > useful to us. There's huge piles of existing bash scripts and makefiles
> > > > that achieve about what I think packit-the-cli would give us so it
> > > > would be some amount of work with no obvious benefit to move at the
> > > > moment. Generally speaking, though, I'm not against the idea.
> > > 
> > > When we started packit, we played with the scripts and makefiles in
> > > your kernel repo and I hope it's not too bold of me to say that it
> > > shouldn't be that hard to integrate the two now.
> > > 
> > > I'm assuming you're using pagure.io - at this point, we're not going
> > > to integrate packit with pagure (for obvious reasons). What are your
> > > future plans for the git forge?
> > 
> > What the heck are you talking about? pagure.io is not going away
> > anytime soon. And there will be other pagure instances that host
> > source code that packit integration support would be useful for.
> > 
> > Hell, I've already offered to help with the pagure.io service.
> > 
> 
> The whole situation is bit unfortunate, as the announcement made it
> seem like pagure.io is going away.

I mean, I have my issues with the announcement, but this seems like an
unfair criticism. The *first paragraph* ends with "We are opting for
GitLab for our dist git and project hosting and will continue to run
pagure.io with community assistance." Every other mention of pagure.io
clearly communicates that it will continue to run for at least a year
and the preference is to keep it running permanently with community
maintenance. I don't know where you get the idea that it is going away
from the announcement.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux