On Thu, Apr 9, 2020, at 12:33 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 11:41 AM Tomas Tomecek <ttomecek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 4:34 PM Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > We actually are. I assume you're asking about why we're not using > > > packit. We're not on GitHub so the service isn't (as far as I can tell) > > > useful to us. There's huge piles of existing bash scripts and makefiles > > > that achieve about what I think packit-the-cli would give us so it > > > would be some amount of work with no obvious benefit to move at the > > > moment. Generally speaking, though, I'm not against the idea. > > > > When we started packit, we played with the scripts and makefiles in > > your kernel repo and I hope it's not too bold of me to say that it > > shouldn't be that hard to integrate the two now. > > > > I'm assuming you're using pagure.io - at this point, we're not going > > to integrate packit with pagure (for obvious reasons). What are your > > future plans for the git forge? > > What the heck are you talking about? pagure.io is not going away > anytime soon. And there will be other pagure instances that host > source code that packit integration support would be useful for. > > Hell, I've already offered to help with the pagure.io service. > The whole situation is bit unfortunate, as the announcement made it seem like pagure.io is going away. SSSD project just yesterday switched to Github from Pagure. I hope to see Pagure continue doing great things, and I appreciate your involvement. V/r, James Cassell _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
