On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 11:41 AM Tomas Tomecek <ttomecek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 4:34 PM Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > We actually are. I assume you're asking about why we're not using > > packit. We're not on GitHub so the service isn't (as far as I can tell) > > useful to us. There's huge piles of existing bash scripts and makefiles > > that achieve about what I think packit-the-cli would give us so it > > would be some amount of work with no obvious benefit to move at the > > moment. Generally speaking, though, I'm not against the idea. > > When we started packit, we played with the scripts and makefiles in > your kernel repo and I hope it's not too bold of me to say that it > shouldn't be that hard to integrate the two now. > > I'm assuming you're using pagure.io - at this point, we're not going > to integrate packit with pagure (for obvious reasons). What are your > future plans for the git forge? What the heck are you talking about? pagure.io is not going away anytime soon. And there will be other pagure instances that host source code that packit integration support would be useful for. Hell, I've already offered to help with the pagure.io service. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
