Re: The future of pkgdb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Dne 25.4.2017 v 21:54 Jason L Tibbitts III napsal(a):
>>>>>> "KF" == Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> [Using foo-owner@fp.o as the default owner for bugs]
> KF> But also disadvantages of people liking to see a name they can point
> KF> to about the package or know who is cc'ed on the bug.
>
> For years I've wondered why we don't do that, honestly.  But I think it
> might be weird that bugzilla separates the owner of a package from the
> owner of a bug, and some of the interactions might be non-obvious.
>
> When I take a bug, will the other maintainers still be notified?  Will
> bugzilla send mail to foo-owner as well as CC'ing the maintainers, so
> that everyone gets each message twice?
>
> Will someone be able to log into bugzilla as foo-owner?
>
> What happens to bugs marked as private?  If they're private to foo-owner
> then how will the actual maintainers see them?

I had similar question about FAS groups ... here is my PR which may
answer some of your questions:

https://github.com/fedora-infra/pkgdb2/pull/414

While you are adding several interesting questions on top of that :)


Vít
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux