On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:00:15 +0100 Michal Novotny <clime@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > I honestly don't understand what is purpose of the f26 vs master. > > Why we have empty master currently (speaking of dist-git)? master > > should be the same as rawhide, as it is in Fedora. > > > Yes, I think that makes more sense as well. > > > P.S. Adding devel to the recipient list so that more people can > comment. Well, my thought was this would be a good way to clean out old stale projects. ie: right now we have f26 (rawhide), f25, f24 once we branch f26, projects have f26, f25, f24 and if they like they can enable and rebuild for the now existing f27 (rawhide). When f24 goes eol and is disabled, look at projects that don't have any builds anymore and remove them. repeat each cycle. This means you need to pay attention and rebuild your coprs for new branches as they appear, but it also means if you don't the old project disappears. Of course many projects also build for epel, so they would stick around for that reason for a long time. If we move back to having a rawhide/devel/master repo the problem becomes "which rawhide" ? if you build something in that branch a year ago, what are the chances it will still work? Just my thoughts... kevin
Attachment:
pgpjjYBZ4Nyi0.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
