|
I honestly don't understand what is purpose of the f26 vs master.
Why we have empty master currently (speaking of dist-git)? master
should be the same as rawhide, as it is in Fedora.
Vít
Dne 21.2.2017 v 10:05 Michal Novotny
napsal(a):
Hello folks,
We have quite recently changed naming of rawhide chroot to
fXY in COPR and I would like to know your opinion about
it.
As branching is behind the door, I tried to consider it
again and slightly changed my mind. The main problem with
just fXY is that it is probably not very intuitive.
"rawhide" tells clearly that rawhide repos are used whereas
with just fXY, the repos used for the chroot need to be
switched at branching (from rawhide to the fXY ones).
We were probably trying to be too fancy here thinking that the
follow-up features (all package rebuilding and chroot forking)
will complement it well. These features can, however, work
with both namings and the "rawhide" chroot just plays much
better with mock and how it introduces the new chroot configs.
We can go either way but to me the "just-call-it-rawhide"
seems to be more simple now while also providing nicer user
experience.
clime
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
