Re: State of python3 in our infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 12:14:42PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good morning everyone,
> 
> I would like to start gathering our thoughts about python3 in our apps.
> 
> To my knowledge, we currently have two applications that are python3 (only):
> - Mailman3 core (as in hyperkitty is still py2)
> - mdapi
> 
> Both are *not* running via apache/mod_wsgi. MM3 runs on RHEL7 while mdapi runs
> on a Fedora node for the moment.

What are they using instead of apache/mod_wsgi?

> So, what do we think about python3 app in our infrastructure? Are we ok with
> it? Do we want to avoid them for the moment? Do we want to split 'backend' vs
> 'frontend' (ie web-apps)?

I'm definitely in favor of driving as much stuff towards py3 in our
infra as possible, but I think we should try and run them the same way
we do with all of other other apps (apache+mod_wsgi).

luke

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux