On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 21:36:51 +0000 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 09/20/2013 07:19 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > I really dont see any compelling reasons to move > > off of Red Hats bugzilla today. > > After bit of discussion there is a compelling reason to move entirely > away from Red Hat bugzilla as well as away from hosting our own and > probably is the correct way forward for us. "us" ? > 1. Generic attitude of many maintainers is that either they go to the > correct place ( upstream ) or they get their bugzilla ignored. citation needed. There are surely components where this is the case, but many others where it's not. Personally, I help/answer bugzilla bugs, when/if they become clearly a upstream issue I ask the reporter if they would like to file it upstream or would like me to. > 2. More often than not downstream maintainer as in packager does not > know the code at all so filling the bug downstream makes no sense. It does in many cases. * It's a packaging bug. * It's a request for a version update or something like that. * It's something related to interaction between packages. * It's something that is already fixed upstream and the Fedora package simply needs to add the patch. etc etc. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
