Re: Bug in unretiring a package?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:05:15AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 15:03:38 +0200
> Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > A reoccuring problem, it seems:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890769#c20
> > 
> > The entire Wiki page does nowhere refer to the branch name for
> > "the current release". Some have tried "f20", others "master",
> > Jon Ciesla refers to "devel".
> > 

yeah -- it's probably that devel is old knowledge -- it's what the branch
was named in cvs.

Since moving to git, the only visible place that we use it is in pkgdb.
Everywhere else that's user visible is either the branch name (f19 in bodhi,
for isntance) or master (from git).  On the backend, there's likely a lot of
things that still use "devel", though, so I'm not sure how easy it would be
to change.  Might be able to add some sort of aliasing.... someone would
have to take a look in the code though.

> > Clarification much appreciated
> 
> My understanding is that the scm admin is the one to undepreciate a
> package thats coming back into the collection from being retired. I can
> clarify with Jon. 
> 
Yep, this is how things should work.  Probably just need to coordinate with
the scm admins -- the script that helps deal with scm admin requests
probably doesn't handle this case so it would have to be done with
a different tool (or possibly from the web page).

-Toshio

Attachment: pgpGBc5ggp4p2.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux