Re: Bug in unretiring a package?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 15:03:38 +0200
Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:15:24 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:08:42 +0200, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote:
> > 
> > > It might make sense to wait for the rel-eng answer, as they have
> > > not yet responded to the ticket that's being referenced to.
> > 
> > Does that mean steps 5 and 6 on this page should be reversed?
> > 
> >   http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Deprecated_Package
> > 
> > I've thought unblocking (in koji) and ownership in pkgdb are
> > separate from eachother.
> 
> A reoccuring problem, it seems:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890769#c20
> 
> The entire Wiki page does nowhere refer to the branch name for
> "the current release". Some have tried "f20", others "master",
> Jon Ciesla refers to "devel".
> 
> Clarification much appreciated

My understanding is that the scm admin is the one to undepreciate a
package thats coming back into the collection from being retired. I can
clarify with Jon. 

I've done it for this package. 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux