On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 03:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Mike McGrath wrote: > > Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> > >> Crazy idea: > >> > >> Voice support for end users by other end users. > > > > I'm not going to say no to this, but I am going to say that if this is a > > service we are serious about offering, it will take $$. Whereas the > > contributor only bridge can be made available now with our current > > resources. > > It will take $$ as in we need to talk to Max Spevack and get more funds > or we need to make users pay for the service? I can't see Fedora trying to make users pay for a support service like that, especially when it's staffed by volunteers. While it would take some resources, I don't think that it would be an extremely huge one. A server or two and some dedicated bandwidth would do it I think (so that downloads of Fedora Release N don't kill the quality of your VoIP connections). The idea has merit, I think that it's something more suited for Fedora Project PBX 2.0 though. Jeff
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
