On 8/7/07, Jeffrey C. Ollie <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 03:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Mike McGrath wrote: > > > Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > >> > > >> Crazy idea: > > >> > > >> Voice support for end users by other end users. > > > > > > I'm not going to say no to this, but I am going to say that if this is a > > > service we are serious about offering, it will take $$. Whereas the > > > contributor only bridge can be made available now with our current > > > resources. > > > > It will take $$ as in we need to talk to Max Spevack and get more funds > > or we need to make users pay for the service? > > I can't see Fedora trying to make users pay for a support service like > that, especially when it's staffed by volunteers. While it would take > some resources, I don't think that it would be an extremely huge one. A > server or two and some dedicated bandwidth would do it I think (so that > downloads of Fedora Release N don't kill the quality of your VoIP > connections). > All of which cost RH money, and has various liability issues depending on where it is housed. -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"
