On गुरुवार 27 डिसेंबर 2012 08:55 म.नं., Dave Crossland wrote: > On 27 December 2012 15:23, Richard Fontana <rfontana@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 11:04:12AM +0000, Dave Crossland wrote: >>> On 27 December 2012 08:57, Pravin Satpute <psatpute@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> 2. Added Trademark line in COPYRIGHT file >>> I am very confused - this contradicts the idea of dropping of the RFN. >> That statement itself seems to contradict something you said on this >> list on 6 December 2012 regarding Overpass: >> >> If 'Overpass' is considered a valuable Red Hat trademark, I'd >> personally suggest declaring trademark notices alongside copyright >> notices for both licenses. >> >> (unless I misunderstood it). >> >> In any case, I don't see a contradiction. The RFN is used to add a >> trademark-like copyright condition to the OFL. The trademark notice is >> just a trademark notice. > Right - but Pravin said, > >>>> we have decided to drop RFN from Lohit fonts. > which suggest removing trademark notices also. I understood the concern you raised regarding distributed font development. I think we need some protection from License itself for this purpose. Regards, Pravin Satpute _______________________________________________ fonts mailing list fonts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
