On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 11:04:12AM +0000, Dave Crossland wrote: > On 27 December 2012 08:57, Pravin Satpute <psatpute@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > 2. Added Trademark line in COPYRIGHT file > > I am very confused - this contradicts the idea of dropping of the RFN. That statement itself seems to contradict something you said on this list on 6 December 2012 regarding Overpass: If 'Overpass' is considered a valuable Red Hat trademark, I'd personally suggest declaring trademark notices alongside copyright notices for both licenses. (unless I misunderstood it). In any case, I don't see a contradiction. The RFN is used to add a trademark-like copyright condition to the OFL. The trademark notice is just a trademark notice. - RF _______________________________________________ fonts mailing list fonts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
