On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 08:57 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 01:31 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 08:14 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 16:30 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > > > > > > > Thoughts? Suggestions are welcomed. > > BTW: Your spec lost /usr/bin/cpan > > > What about the other Test:: items? Do you think they are safe to move to > > -devel? > Soapbox answer: I would expect moving all Test:: modules to *-devel to > be safe, but details need to be looked into before. > > A quick check (rpm -q --whatrequires) seems to indicate that all base > Test::'s but Test::Builder probably will be non-problematic. > > > Or should we just put all of Test:: in base for now? > Can't we gradually move them? > > ATM, IMO, getting "perl-modules" buildable again and obtaining clarity > on how to continue with perl-devel in FC7 should have highest priority. > > Moving Test:: and further candidates can wait. OK. I'm fine with that. Your patches look good. ~spot
