Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Warren Togami wrote: >> Ralf Corsepius wrote: >>> >>> As this thing doesn't seem to be baked yet[1], and as I don't want to >>> see FE-6 and FE-5 being locked out from updates, for now, I will ignore >>> this issue on rawhide, i.e. you will likely see broken EVRs between >>> rawhide and older FE, on my perl-modules, soon. >> Why broken EVR's? > > Most perl module packages can use a common spec file across all > branches, except this is now broken in devel since perl-devel is > needed to build even noarch perl-based packages. So Ralf isn't > updating perl modules in devel until this is resolved, with the result > that updated packages in branches for older releases have higher EVRs > than the equivalent packages in devel. I'm doing likewise for the > moment. If we retroactively add a 'Provides: perl-devel' to versions of perl in older distributions, will that help? -RN -- Robin Norwood Red Hat, Inc. "The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone." -Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching
