On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 15:38 +0000, Paul Howarth wrote: > Warren Togami wrote: > > Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >> > >> As this thing doesn't seem to be baked yet[1], and as I don't want to > >> see FE-6 and FE-5 being locked out from updates, for now, I will ignore > >> this issue on rawhide, i.e. you will likely see broken EVRs between > >> rawhide and older FE, on my perl-modules, soon. > > > > Why broken EVR's? I should have been more explicit. I was referring to EVR's between different versions of Fedora. ATM, you'll see EVRs of some of my perl-modules in FC6 carrying higher EVRs than that in rawhide. > Most perl module packages can use a common spec file across all > branches, except this is now broken in devel since perl-devel is needed > to build even noarch perl-based packages. So Ralf isn't updating perl > modules in devel until this is resolved, Exactly, I do not want to change the 45+ perl-modules, I maintain, before the outcome of this issue is clear (A one-time change/mass-rebuild would be OK with me - once the outcome is clear) > with the result that updated > packages in branches for older releases have higher EVRs than the > equivalent packages in devel. I'm doing likewise for the moment. Ralf
