* Mikolaj Izdebski: > What do you think about allowing Class-Path manifest attribute? Can it > be allowed in any case, or in some cases only? I brought it up before. I do agree that the policy is wrong: Why no Class-Path manifest attribute? <https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/java-devel/2013-May/004817.html> Discussion continues in June. I have found it difficult to reconcile the actual OpenJDK behavior with the claims in this thread (about Class-Path use with -classpath, and the ability to override Class-Path-referenced JARs). I do believe the rule banning Class-Path makes no sense, and something like this manifest attribute is needed to prevent dependencies from bubbling up to the application level. Thanks, Florian _______________________________________________ java-devel mailing list -- java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to java-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
