Re: jansi 2.x and jline 3.x

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 5:36 PM Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 12:22 PM Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I am building jansi 2.1.1 in the side tag, and will build log4j and
> > maven once that's done.
> > I'd like to have mbooth look at the jline PR, it's his package.
>
> By all means!  More eyes on a change like this is a good thing.
>
> > Thanks again for working on this.
>
> My pleasure.  I seem to have a weak spot for programming languages.
> Once all this is done, I'll be maintaining 3 Common Lisps, a Scheme, a
> Prolog, an ML, and finally Scala. :-)  Honestly, though, in every case
> it isn't the language itself that I'm interested in, but rather some
> other package(s) written in that language.

I mentioned the jline 3 transition to mbooth on the #fedora-java IRC
channel, and he told me that so long as there's a transition plan for
migrating packages to the jline2 compat package, it's fine.

Fabio
_______________________________________________
java-devel mailing list -- java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to java-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Red Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux