On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 4:36 PM Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 6:57 AM Mikolaj Izdebski <mizdebsk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Duplicate osgi provides are generally not a problem. Duplicate mvn > > provides are, but there is a solution to this problem: compat > > packages, see https://fedora-java.github.io/howto/latest/#compat_packages > > Compat packages have different mvn provides, eg. > > mvn(org.fusesource.jansi:jansi:1) = 1.18 > > Yes, Severin pointed that out, so I have updated the COPR accordingly. > This means little changes and rebuilds for packages that consume jansi > 1.x and jline 2.x, which I have also built in COPR: > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jjames/scala/ > > > My preference would be to update jansi/jline to latest upstream > > versions and introduce compat packages jansi1/jline2 if necessary. > > Thanks for the input, Mikolaj. Since that seems to be everybody's > preference, I will go with that plan. Regards, Thanks for working on this! As main admin for jansi/-native, I approve of this approach. Do you plan to submit PRs for jansi and jline? At least creating the compat packages is at least easy. Fabio _______________________________________________ java-devel mailing list -- java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to java-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
