On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 4:46 AM Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I would like to keep jacop in Fedora. It is in danger of removal, due > to the orphaning of scala. I've taken a look at keeping scala in > Fedora, and updating it to its most recent version; see: > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jjames/scala/ > > One issue is that recent scala needs jline 3.x (we have 2.x in > Rawhide), and jline 3.x needs jansi 2.x (we have 1.x in Rawhide). > Neither is backwards compatible with its previous major version. I > have made jansi 1.x/2.x and jline 2.x/3.x parallel installable, but > there is still at least one issue. The current jansi package > Provides: > > jansi = 1.18-5.fc33 > mvn(org.fusesource.jansi:jansi) = 1.18 > mvn(org.fusesource.jansi:jansi-project:pom:) = 1.18 > mvn(org.fusesource.jansi:jansi:pom:) = 1.18 > osgi(org.fusesource.jansi) = 1.18.0 > > The jansi2 package on COPR Provides: > > jansi2 = 2.1.0-1.fc34 > jansi2(x86-64) = 2.1.0-1.fc34 > libjansi.so()(64bit) > mvn(org.fusesource.jansi:jansi) = 2.1.0 > mvn(org.fusesource.jansi:jansi:pom:) = 2.1.0 > osgi(org.fusesource.jansi) = 2.1.0 > > There is overlap between the Provides, albeit with different version > numbers. How should this be handled? I guess that packages that need > version 1.x would have to include "BuildRequires: jansi < 2" and > "Requires: jansi"? Duplicate osgi provides are generally not a problem. Duplicate mvn provides are, but there is a solution to this problem: compat packages, see https://fedora-java.github.io/howto/latest/#compat_packages Compat packages have different mvn provides, eg. mvn(org.fusesource.jansi:jansi:1) = 1.18 > > Also, is it better to keep the existing jansi and jline packages, and > add jansi2 and jline3 packages as I have done on COPR, or would it be > better to add jansi1 and jline2 packages containing the current > contents of jansi and jline, and then move jansi and jline to their > latest versions? My preference would be to update jansi/jline to latest upstream versions and introduce compat packages jansi1/jline2 if necessary. > I appreciate any thoughts anyone has on the matter. Regards, > -- > Jerry James > http://www.jamezone.org/ > _______________________________________________ > java-devel mailing list -- java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to java-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ java-devel mailing list -- java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to java-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
