On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 2:21 AM Severin Gehwolf <sgehwolf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I believe the right thing to do would be to move to jline 3 for package > 'jline' in rawhide and better, and perhaps keep jline2 as a > compatibility package[1], like jline1 was at some point. That is, if > some packages won't work with jline 3. Yes, some packages won't even build with jline 3. > %mvn_compat_version macro might be helpful. See for example: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/jline1/blob/f31/f/jline1.spec#_95 Ah, that's what %mvn_compat_version is for! I found its man page to be rather unhelpful, I'm afraid. Okay, I will try that out. Thank you! -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ _______________________________________________ java-devel mailing list -- java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to java-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
