Re: jansi 2.x and jline 3.x

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 6:57 AM Mikolaj Izdebski <mizdebsk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Duplicate osgi provides are generally not a problem. Duplicate mvn
> provides are, but there is a solution to this problem: compat
> packages, see https://fedora-java.github.io/howto/latest/#compat_packages
> Compat packages have different mvn provides, eg.
> mvn(org.fusesource.jansi:jansi:1) = 1.18

Yes, Severin pointed that out, so I have updated the COPR accordingly.
This means little changes and rebuilds for packages that consume jansi
1.x and jline 2.x, which I have also built in COPR:

https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jjames/scala/

> My preference would be to update jansi/jline to latest upstream
> versions and introduce compat packages jansi1/jline2 if necessary.

Thanks for the input, Mikolaj.  Since that seems to be everybody's
preference, I will go with that plan.  Regards,
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
_______________________________________________
java-devel mailing list -- java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to java-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Red Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux