Re: [Marketing] Re: [MAGAZINE PROPOSAL] Fwd: [DRAFT] Why we're retiring 32-bit Images (was Re: Retiring 32-bit images)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 17:41 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:

> Concretely, in today's existing infrastructure and world, yes.  A
> secondary arch does builds on a separate koji instance and failing
> builds there don't impact the builds in primary.
> 
> However, a while ago Dennis proposed a different world (with related
> infrastructure changes) where that wouldn't necessarily be the case.
> I forget where we had the discussion about it.  It might have been the
> rel-eng list.  He hasn't pushed it much publicly though, and I don't
> want to speak for him.

I think my understanding of the proposal was that secondary arch builds
would happen in the primary Koji instance, but still would not prevent
the primary arch builds from being tagged. IMBW, though.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux