On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ust a note: python-webob1.1 would be better (packaging guidelines were > recently updated to allow dots in package names for this purpose.). You can > ask the upstream if they have any backwards compatibility to version number > policies as well. Sometimes when a project goes to 1.0 and beyond, they > change their versioning policies so that major number releases are all > compatible. Other times they stick with the minor number since they've > gotten used to it throughout their 0.x development. Hi, I've just posted python-webobj10 which is 1.0.8. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754848 I don't seem to be able to edit the wiki page. Steve. -- Steve Traylen _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
