On 11/17/2011 09:50 PM, Steve Traylen wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> ust a note: python-webob1.1 would be better (packaging guidelines were >> recently updated to allow dots in package names for this purpose.). You can >> ask the upstream if they have any backwards compatibility to version number >> policies as well. Sometimes when a project goes to 1.0 and beyond, they >> change their versioning policies so that major number releases are all >> compatible. Other times they stick with the minor number since they've >> gotten used to it throughout their 0.x development. > > Hi, > I've just posted python-webobj10 which is 1.0.8. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754848 I'm reviewing the above. I've posted python-sqlalchemy0.7-0.7.3-2 here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755065 Review swap? I've built local glance and nova packages against the above 2 compat packages and initial tests are passing. I'm commit the openstack updates soon. cheers, Pádraig. _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
