On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:12:25PM +0100, Steve Traylen wrote: > 2011/11/17 Pádraig Brady <P@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > packages to epel. Steve, feel free to tackle webob1.0 (1.0.8). > > If not I'll do it after I submit python-sqlalchemy0.7 (0.7.3) > > (after confirming here first). > > The latest is 1.1.1 > http://pypi.python.org/pypi/WebOb > > this is better choice I guess unless there is a reason? > python-webob11 for a package name. > Just a note: python-webob1.1 would be better (packaging guidelines were recently updated to allow dots in package names for this purpose.). You can ask the upstream if they have any backwards compatibility to version number policies as well. Sometimes when a project goes to 1.0 and beyond, they change their versioning policies so that major number releases are all compatible. Other times they stick with the minor number since they've gotten used to it throughout their 0.x development. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpx6nss9j408.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
