On 11/17/2011 09:50 PM, Steve Traylen wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> ust a note: python-webob1.1 would be better (packaging guidelines were >> recently updated to allow dots in package names for this purpose.). You can >> ask the upstream if they have any backwards compatibility to version number >> policies as well. Sometimes when a project goes to 1.0 and beyond, they >> change their versioning policies so that major number releases are all >> compatible. Other times they stick with the minor number since they've >> gotten used to it throughout their 0.x development. > > Hi, > I've just posted python-webobj10 which is 1.0.8. Excellent thanks. I'll try this out tomorrow. You did name the package correctly as "webob" rather than "webobj" as you typoed above :) One thing I would adjust is s/10/1.0/ About using v1.1.1, I think it's better to align with what's used in Fedora, rather moving ahead to the lastest and "greatest". This will be a relatively short lived package in any case, as we'll probably be updating the package proper in RHEL 6.3 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754848 > I don't seem to be able to edit the wiki page. I've just updated the wiki there: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OpenStack#OpenStack_in_EPEL You should be able to also, if you have a fedora account. One thing I noticed is that you need to shift-refresh on a wiki page after login, for editing links to be apparent. cheers, Pádraig. _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
