On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 01:05:06PM -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm at mattdm.org> wrote: > > Question One: > > > > How attached are we to the upstream subpackage names? I'd like of like to > > change them to more descriptive names: > > If they're from separate tarballs, obviously we'd want to match the > naming and have them be separate source packages. If they're just > subpackages, rename them! And probably make sure to provide the > upstream names for compatibility's sake, but I'm a big fan of names > that are parseable They are subpacakges: we have a single giant tarball where we build both the java components (clc, sc and walrus) and the C components (nc, cc and gl) and the spec file we have reflects that, building everything in one go but creating multiple packages. cheers graziano > > - Jeremy > _______________________________________________ > cloud mailing list > cloud at lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud -- Graziano Obertelli Eucalyptus Systems, Inc. 130 Castilian St. Goleta, CA 93117 Office: 805-845-8000 www.eucalyptus.com
