That's perfect. I did some packaging work on eucalyptus few month ago and went the same way. On Feb 2, 2010 6:37 PM, "Matthew Miller" <mattdm at mattdm.org> wrote: Question One: How attached are we to the upstream subpackage names? I'd like of like to change them to more descriptive names: eucalyptus-sc -> eucalyptus-storage-controller eucalyptus-cloud -> eucalyptus-cloud-controller eucalyptus-cc -> eucalyptus-cluster-controller eucalyptus-nc -> eucalyptus-node-controller eucalyptus-gl -> eucalyptus-gatherlog Does anyone have strong opinions on this? -- Matthew Miller <mattdm at mattdm.org> Senior Systems Architect -- Instructional & Research Computing Services Computing & Information Technology Harvard School of Engineering & Applied Sciences _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud at lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/cloud/attachments/20100202/f8feff8c/attachment.html
