On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm at mattdm.org> wrote: > Question One: > > How attached are we to the upstream subpackage names? I'd like of like to > change them to more descriptive names: If they're from separate tarballs, obviously we'd want to match the naming and have them be separate source packages. If they're just subpackages, rename them! And probably make sure to provide the upstream names for compatibility's sake, but I'm a big fan of names that are parseable - Jeremy
