El Sun, 01 Jan 2012 02:55:46 +0000
Gordan Bobic <gordan@xxxxxxxxxx> escribió:
> On 01/01/2012 02:53 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > El Sun, 01 Jan 2012 02:34:33 +0000
> > Gordan Bobic<gordan@xxxxxxxxxx> escribió:
> >> On 01/01/2012 02:28 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> >>> El Sun, 01 Jan 2012 01:43:17 +0000
> >>> Gordan Bobic<gordan@xxxxxxxxxx> escribió:
> >>>> On 01/01/2012 01:16 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> >>>>> El Sat, 31 Dec 2011 13:26:00 -0700
> >>>>> <webwillow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escribió:
> >>>>>> As i have come across the builds of rpm's in koji i noticed
> >>>>>> that some packages have something like dist_0.src.rpm or
> >>>>>> dist_1.src.rpm instead if dist.src.rpm. This causes koji to
> >>>>>> spit them out due to version mismatch errors, how is this
> >>>>>> addressed by the fedora team? Do ou have to modify the main
> >>>>>> tag or?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> we make the srpms from a git checkout on primary arches.
> >>>>> %{?dist} is set to whats expected inside the buildroot used to
> >>>>> make the srpms. the srpms we feed into secondary arches have
> >>>>> matching fedora-release installed and get the right values.
> >>>>> without specifics about what your talking about or doing there
> >>>>> is no way to help you.
> >>>>
> >>>> I believe what Don is talking about is that some src.rpm packages
> >>>> are called dist_<number>.src.rpm instead of
> >>>> dist.<number>.src.rpm, and what we have found is that koji seems
> >>>> to choke on this. But if you:
> >>>>
> >>>> rpm -ivh mypackage-1.2.3.dist_1.src.rpm
> >>>> cd ~/rpmbuild/SPECS
> >>>> rpmbuild -bs mypackage.spec
> >>>>
> >>>> you end up with mypackage-1.2.3.dist.1.src.rpm
> >>>>
> >>>> If you feed the original file with the underscore to koji, it
> >>>> chokes on it. If you feed it the newly generated src.rpm with
> >>>> the . in the name instead of _, it works fine.
> >>>>
> >>>> What Don and I are wondering about is where did these _ named
> >>>> packages come from and why.
> >>>
> >>> im guessing then your talking about rhel rpms. the dist value
> >>> would be set to whats in the srpm at its build time.
> >>
> >> Yes we are talking about the RHEL6 rpms, but the problem isn't in
> >> the dist part - the problem seems to be that something has ended up
> >> creating the src.rpms with the _ separator after the dist part for
> >> some reason.
> >
> > thats part of the dist tag
>
> I think I just twigged what you actually mean. There must have been a
> builder with a broken dist tag setting?
its set in the buildroot. so you have two choices. 1) make sure you set
it to match the srpms you feed in. 2) rebuild the srpms to match what
you are using.
Dennis
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
