El Sun, 01 Jan 2012 01:43:17 +0000
Gordan Bobic <gordan@xxxxxxxxxx> escribió:
> On 01/01/2012 01:16 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > El Sat, 31 Dec 2011 13:26:00 -0700
> > <webwillow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escribió:
> >> As i have come across the builds of rpm's in koji i noticed that
> >> some packages have something like dist_0.src.rpm or dist_1.src.rpm
> >> instead if dist.src.rpm. This causes koji to spit them out due to
> >> version mismatch errors, how is this addressed by the fedora team?
> >> Do ou have to modify the main tag or?
> >
> > we make the srpms from a git checkout on primary arches. %{?dist} is
> > set to whats expected inside the buildroot used to make the srpms.
> > the srpms we feed into secondary arches have matching fedora-release
> > installed and get the right values. without specifics about what
> > your talking about or doing there is no way to help you.
>
> I believe what Don is talking about is that some src.rpm packages are
> called dist_<number>.src.rpm instead of dist.<number>.src.rpm, and
> what we have found is that koji seems to choke on this. But if you:
>
> rpm -ivh mypackage-1.2.3.dist_1.src.rpm
> cd ~/rpmbuild/SPECS
> rpmbuild -bs mypackage.spec
>
> you end up with mypackage-1.2.3.dist.1.src.rpm
>
> If you feed the original file with the underscore to koji, it chokes
> on it. If you feed it the newly generated src.rpm with the . in the
> name instead of _, it works fine.
>
> What Don and I are wondering about is where did these _ named
> packages come from and why.
im guessing then your talking about rhel rpms. the dist value would be
set to whats in the srpm at its build time.
Dennis
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
