El Sun, 01 Jan 2012 02:34:33 +0000 Gordan Bobic <gordan@xxxxxxxxxx> escribió: > On 01/01/2012 02:28 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > El Sun, 01 Jan 2012 01:43:17 +0000 > > Gordan Bobic<gordan@xxxxxxxxxx> escribió: > >> On 01/01/2012 01:16 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > >>> El Sat, 31 Dec 2011 13:26:00 -0700 > >>> <webwillow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escribió: > >>>> As i have come across the builds of rpm's in koji i noticed that > >>>> some packages have something like dist_0.src.rpm or > >>>> dist_1.src.rpm instead if dist.src.rpm. This causes koji to spit > >>>> them out due to version mismatch errors, how is this addressed > >>>> by the fedora team? Do ou have to modify the main tag or? > >>> > >>> we make the srpms from a git checkout on primary arches. %{?dist} > >>> is set to whats expected inside the buildroot used to make the > >>> srpms. the srpms we feed into secondary arches have matching > >>> fedora-release installed and get the right values. without > >>> specifics about what your talking about or doing there is no way > >>> to help you. > >> > >> I believe what Don is talking about is that some src.rpm packages > >> are called dist_<number>.src.rpm instead of dist.<number>.src.rpm, > >> and what we have found is that koji seems to choke on this. But if > >> you: > >> > >> rpm -ivh mypackage-1.2.3.dist_1.src.rpm > >> cd ~/rpmbuild/SPECS > >> rpmbuild -bs mypackage.spec > >> > >> you end up with mypackage-1.2.3.dist.1.src.rpm > >> > >> If you feed the original file with the underscore to koji, it > >> chokes on it. If you feed it the newly generated src.rpm with > >> the . in the name instead of _, it works fine. > >> > >> What Don and I are wondering about is where did these _ named > >> packages come from and why. > > > > im guessing then your talking about rhel rpms. the dist value > > would be set to whats in the srpm at its build time. > > Yes we are talking about the RHEL6 rpms, but the problem isn't in the > dist part - the problem seems to be that something has ended up > creating the src.rpms with the _ separator after the dist part for > some reason. thats part of the dist tag Dennis _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm