On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 4:08 PM Daniel Pocock <daniel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 21/09/2020 21:54, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 3:27 PM Daniel Pocock <daniel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On 21/09/2020 21:08, Josh Boyer wrote: > >>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 2:43 PM Daniel Pocock <daniel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> At various times this year, people have written things that appeared on > >>>> Planet Fedora and other people had no right of reply because their blogs > >>>> were never included there or blogs had been actively censored. > >>>> > >>>> Given the latest discussions taking place about what potentially amounts > >>>> to censorship, I feel it is critical that anybody with a view is able to > >>>> use all communication channels, including Planet Fedora, to draw > >>>> attention to whatever concerns they have. > >>> > >>> Since we're offering opinions, I'll offer mine as well. > >>> > >>> I feel the opposite and find blog posts unrelated to Fedora appearing > >>> on Planet Fedora to be a distraction. I also feel that this isn't > >>> censorship as there is no inherent right to post whatever people want > >>> on Fedora run services. > >> > >> > >> Nonetheless, if somebody does in fact post a distraction, why shouldn't > >> people impacted by the distraction have a right-of-reply, in your terms, > >> posting a counter-distraction? > > > > This is a good question. I would do 2 things. > > > > 1) Offer the ability for people to make take-down requests, removing > > the specific post from the aggregator. > > 2) If 1 got too large then just remove the aggregator entirely and > > replace it with vetted and curated blog posts driven through the a > > dedicated Fedora SIG focused on reviewing the content. > > > Fedora is full of smart people with smart ideas > > For example, did you know somebody registered fedora.community back in > 2015? They deserve a medal. > > Your idea is equally smart: > > - an uncurated planet > > - a curated newsletter (or alternative planet) That would be your idea. I would not advocate for an uncurated planet. > Each person can then choose which one they subscribe to. Before the > web, most organizations, from football clubs to student unions only had > the latter, a curated newsletter. > > The funny thing is, this split already started to happen with > uncensored.some-other.community vs planet.some-other.org > > I'm glad we are in agreement. If nobody else volunteers, I'd volunteer > to work on the curated.fedora.community site. We aren't in agreement, but it is good to know you are willing to volunteer. josh _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list -- council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to council-discuss-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
