On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 3:27 PM Daniel Pocock <daniel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 21/09/2020 21:08, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 2:43 PM Daniel Pocock <daniel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> > >> At various times this year, people have written things that appeared on > >> Planet Fedora and other people had no right of reply because their blogs > >> were never included there or blogs had been actively censored. > >> > >> Given the latest discussions taking place about what potentially amounts > >> to censorship, I feel it is critical that anybody with a view is able to > >> use all communication channels, including Planet Fedora, to draw > >> attention to whatever concerns they have. > > > > Since we're offering opinions, I'll offer mine as well. > > > > I feel the opposite and find blog posts unrelated to Fedora appearing > > on Planet Fedora to be a distraction. I also feel that this isn't > > censorship as there is no inherent right to post whatever people want > > on Fedora run services. > > > Nonetheless, if somebody does in fact post a distraction, why shouldn't > people impacted by the distraction have a right-of-reply, in your terms, > posting a counter-distraction? This is a good question. I would do 2 things. 1) Offer the ability for people to make take-down requests, removing the specific post from the aggregator. 2) If 1 got too large then just remove the aggregator entirely and replace it with vetted and curated blog posts driven through the a dedicated Fedora SIG focused on reviewing the content. josh _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list -- council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to council-discuss-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
