Re: Fedora Censorship status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 21/09/2020 21:08, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 2:43 PM Daniel Pocock <daniel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>> At various times this year, people have written things that appeared on
>> Planet Fedora and other people had no right of reply because their blogs
>> were never included there or blogs had been actively censored.
>>
>> Given the latest discussions taking place about what potentially amounts
>> to censorship, I feel it is critical that anybody with a view is able to
>> use all communication channels, including Planet Fedora, to draw
>> attention to whatever concerns they have.
> 
> Since we're offering opinions, I'll offer mine as well.
> 
> I feel the opposite and find blog posts unrelated to Fedora appearing
> on Planet Fedora to be a distraction.  I also feel that this isn't
> censorship as there is no inherent right to post whatever people want
> on Fedora run services.


Nonetheless, if somebody does in fact post a distraction, why shouldn't
people impacted by the distraction have a right-of-reply, in your terms,
posting a counter-distraction?
_______________________________________________
council-discuss mailing list -- council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to council-discuss-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux