On Tue, 2020-04-07 at 17:27 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > On 07/04/2020 17:13, Justin W. Flory wrote: > > > As someone who never had a salary influence my volunteering with Fedora, > > it makes me uncomfortable when Daniel advocates on behalf of volunteers > > in Fedora. I've hesitated to reply to this thread because I felt a reply > > will get me pounced on, but oh well. > > Please note I never claimed to speak for everybody else, I simply asked > Richard not to do so. I'm not quite sure why you asked that, since I didn't see him do so. > Even in roles where I have been able to advocate on behalf of > volunteers, I've never claimed that all volunteers agree unanimously > with any particular point. I didn't see Richard do that either. What he said was, "I don't think many people are reading your emails now." He wasn't speaking *for* me, when he said that. But he was right, nonetheless. I am struggling to see what actual question, or actionable request that is relevant in the context of Fedora, is hidden in the barrage of dubious prolixity to which you have subjected us.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list -- council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to council-discuss-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
