On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 11:55:32AM -0500, Ben Rosser wrote: > Sorry for the delay in responding here; I admit I wasn't thinking too > much about Fedora over vacation... > > Thanks a lot for the feedback! I think it definitely makes sense to > broaden the proposal to include more than just cleaning up after the > pagure migration-- though I still think that's a good place to start, > since it's something that happened relatively recently. Welcome back, and thanks for reminding me to reply to this. First of all, I really appreciate your proposal. I agree with the others that a larger scope is appropriate for an objective (while at the same time, I'd like there to be definite measurable expected results, too). I'd like to see this include packager experience for our new packaging technologies -- modularity, container images, flatpaks. Having tried to modularize a traditional Fedora desktop application recently, I know for sure that the packager experience is sub-optimal. The current Modularity objective itself is at the end of its timeframe and it's possible that instead of renewing that, those further improvments should be part of this bigger thing. Additionally, some people have been working on a "source git" idea (https://github.com/user-cont/source-git). Do you think that might be in scope? There's a talk coming up on this at DevConf.cz: https://devconfcz2019.sched.com/event/Jch1/auto-maintain-your-package -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list -- council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to council-discuss-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
