On Fri, 2018-12-21 at 16:23 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > Hi Ben, > > Thanks for drafting this. I think it's a great step in the right > direction. You're right that these are all minor annoyances that > aggregate to a bigger problem, so it's good to take a holistic > approach to addressing them. Right now it seems focused on replacing > the features lost by the deprecation of pkgdb. I'd encourage you to > think about what other changes could be made to improve the overall > packaging experience. Before it comes up for a vote, I'd like to see > more concrete goals and a rough idea of how they'd be achieved. > Obviously some of the specifics will become clear and evolve as the > work goes on. I would like to echo Ben here, I think that a package experience objective should look at how to automate the tedious manual repetitive bits in maintaining packages and allow people to only have to deal with things that truely need a person to look at them. I would like to see steps from fully automating package reviews and updates, and letting packagers know when they have something needing attention, to rethinking the workflows entirely. I think that there could be a lot of tie in with the CI objective. Dennis _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list -- council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to council-discuss-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
