Matthew Miller píše v St 11. 01. 2017 v 13:27 -0500: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 12:10:33PM +0100, Jiri Eischmann wrote: > > Fedora+CentOS may be a different case, but it also doesn't always > > have > > to work, the two audiences also don't naturally melt in as I could > > observe at DevConf.cz. > > Tell me more about your observation. :) To me, there was a lot of > interesting CentOS stuff going on, but I couldn't go, because it was > all at the same time as the Fedora stuff. That's the thing. I probably would have attended some CentOS talks, too, but I couldn't because I was busy attending the Fedora talks which are personally prefer. I also talked to several local visitors who came to DevConf.cz for the CentOS talks, they were all typical sysadmins that work with CentOS/RHEL at work and they perceive Fedora as too bleeding edge for their focus and were simply not interested in what's going on in the Fedora Project. I'm not saying that Fedora+CentOS events can't work, just saying that even for distributions which are so close to each other it doesn't work easily. In my opinion, to get some benefit out of it, you need to have agenda that would bring both groups together (just a straight-out-of-my-mind example: how Fedora and CentOS can cooperate in EPEL). If both groups bring their own topics that are (mostly) only interesting to their audience it will be two different events that just happen to be in the same location. Jiri
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list -- council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to council-discuss-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
