On 09/19/2016 01:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:32:22 +0200
Brian Exelbierd <bex@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
One thing the involvement of these groups brings is new people and new
energy. Even if these groups only started to be involved as part of a
weekly issues review we may be able to learn more from the "after
action reports."
I also still feel very strongly that we need after action reporting,
as has been suggested by jflory, amongst others. I believe we should
be able to figure out what actions have been taken and by whom.
We recently switched out irc bot over to using ChanTracker:
https://github.com/ncoevoet/ChanTracker
it keeps track of mode changes, but I don't think it has any easy
reporting capability and things can be annotated when it's used.
I guess 'after action' reviews could be helpful, but do we want to call
out people again in public? say there was a 15minute quiet for a user,
do we want to go over that and note the specific user in public logs
and such? I'm good with learning how better to handle things, but wall
of shame I am not sure about.
As implemented elsewhere, it should be a private page maybe on the wiki
with access allowed only for current ops. So it wouldn't be a public
wall of shame.
~m
_______________________________________________
council-discuss mailing list -- council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to council-discuss-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
