Re: [board] #12: Fedora Council Charter Draft: collect concerns for revisions in preparation for vote

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



#12: Fedora Council Charter Draft: collect concerns for revisions in preparation
for vote
------------------------+-----------------------
 Reporter:  mattdm      |       Owner:  mattdm
   Status:  new         |    Priority:  critical
Component:  Board Meta  |  Resolution:
 Keywords:              |
------------------------+-----------------------

Comment (by inode0):

 Replying to [comment:15 mattdm]:
 > Replying to [comment:13 inode0]:
 > > Replying to [comment:12 mattdm]:
 > > > My concern is with the same people being elected continuously on
 name recognition rather than on platform; it's easy to fall into this. Not
 that those people aren't usually great, just that it gives a chance for
 others and for their new ideas.
 > > Why don't we have the same concern for the other elected positions?
 Aren't they subject to the same thing potentially happening?
 >
 > I have that concern there too, but it's balanced somewhat by a desire
 for continuity in the positions that are directly representative of the
 outreach and building halves of the project, and by the fact that those
 positions will be chosen by the active committees in those areas.

 I don't know how the outreach and building groups will select
 representatives from what I've read so far. The proposal does not call for
 committee selection. While FESCo naturally subsumes all of the
 distro/product building groups, FAmSCo is just an ambassador body.

 Thus far I haven't heard what to me is a compelling reason to treat the
 two seats elected directly by the entire community differently. Part of
 the expressed responsibility of those seats will be to pursue specific
 goals advertised during the election process. What if those goals don't
 have a timetable that can be effectively achieved in one year? I don't see
 any reason to structurally prevent the community at large from saying this
 person has done good work toward those goals and we would like him/her to
 continue for another year. Perhaps the community would simply prefer
 continuity in its representation too.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/board/ticket/12#comment:16>
board <https://fedorahosted.org/board>
Fedora Project Board Public Tickets
_______________________________________________
board-discuss mailing list
board-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/board-discuss





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux