Re: long-term unimportant but important-now question on elected seats

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



El 2014-10-03 13:23, Paul W. Frields escribió:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 03:09:20PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 21:02 +0200, Haïkel wrote:
> 2014-10-03 20:05 GMT+02:00 Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> >
> > I think election for 1 seat with it known that the runner up gets the second
> > seat. The standard method of voting doesn't work well for this (as it is
> > really meant for single seat/multiple candidates) but I believe it has been
> > used for this by us in the past like that for other groups.
> >
>
> Smooge suggestion works for me !

+1

Makes sense to me too.

The way it worked was to avoid the whole board full of new people. With the new proposal I don't see that as an issue. I also agree with the idea of the runner up getting the second chair. It is just simple.

Neville
_______________________________________________
board-discuss mailing list
board-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/board-discuss





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux