Re: long-term unimportant but important-now question on elected seats

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 21:02 +0200, Haïkel wrote:
> 2014-10-03 20:05 GMT+02:00 Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> >
> > I think election for 1 seat with it known that the runner up gets the second
> > seat. The standard method of voting doesn't work well for this (as it is
> > really meant for single seat/multiple candidates) but I believe it has been
> > used for this by us in the past like that for other groups.
> >
> 
> Smooge suggestion works for me !

+1

> 
> Since we're looking for a fresh start, I'd like to get new people asap.
> As for the continuity, there'll be already Matthew and my fellow
> predecessor Jaroslav in the council with plenty of experience, and I
> guess that Engineering/Outreach representatives will be the same.
> Besides, the other old farts (that's how Greg called us I think) will
> be not too far away :)



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
board-discuss mailing list
board-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/board-discuss

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux