Re: long-term unimportant but important-now question on elected seats

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 03:09:20PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 21:02 +0200, Haïkel wrote:
> > 2014-10-03 20:05 GMT+02:00 Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > >
> > >
> > > I think election for 1 seat with it known that the runner up gets the second
> > > seat. The standard method of voting doesn't work well for this (as it is
> > > really meant for single seat/multiple candidates) but I believe it has been
> > > used for this by us in the past like that for other groups.
> > >
> > 
> > Smooge suggestion works for me !
> 
> +1

Makes sense to me too.

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
    The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com
_______________________________________________
board-discuss mailing list
board-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/board-discuss





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux