Re: representative council roles [was Re: [board] #9: board vote on reorganization proposals]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- Original Message -----
> Christoph list is still too large, if we want an effective committee,
> it should be able to hold regular phone calls or meet important
> stakeholders of the project one or twice a year.
> 
> 0. FPL (chairman)
> 1. Technical Committee representative (FESCo, Release Engineering, QA,
> Product)
> 2. Infrastructure/Web representative
> 3. Outreach representative (marketing, ambassadors)
> 4. appointed seat
> 5. appointed seat
> 6. appointed seat
> 7. elected seat
> 8. elected seat
> 9. elected seat

This way, you will get back almost to the standard board we had so far.
We're looking how to make *do-ers* talk together and *do* more together.
I'm not saying elected/appointed folks were not doing anything - they 
do the great job in all bodies, but in my view, council should be 
something different than Board and actually I think it should be
supplement to Board, not replacement. Even looking on this discussion,
I'd say if we do it as supplement, then council could be very informal
body working towards cooperation with direct invitation to a selected
folks and free to join for everyone. It somehow feels more Fedora way
than what we have now.

Jaroslav
_______________________________________________
board-discuss mailing list
board-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/board-discuss





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux