On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 07:04:37PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 10/16/2013 06:46 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > >Marketing promotes things that they feel benefit the project as a whole. > >Promoting Pidora while there's still extreme media interest in Raspberry > >Pi is a rational decision. Have any of the other spins or remixes made > >an argument for inclusion on the front page that marketing agree with? > > > > Has there not been half a decade atleast argument in the community > for the other then the "default" desktop environments as well as > other "spins" to get equal representation of their product, an place > on the front page, links etc on par with "default" so fourth and so > on? Pidora gets nowhere near the representation that the default spin does. If a non-default spin wants to gain more marketing and website attention then the people they should be talking to are the marketing and website teams. Have they done so? -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
