On 03/27/2012 01:36 AM, Nicu Buculei wrote:
On 03/27/2012 09:58 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 03/27/2012 12:18 AM, Robyn Bergeron wrote:
On 03/26/2012 04:46 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
Has it been looked into how many ( % ) of active contributors have
voted in the release naming process each given cycle?
Not necessarily in %, but the total number of votes cast is reported
with each set of election results.
I would think that before deciding anything you will have to know how
many community members actually bother/care enough to vote.
Low voter participation is not necessarily an indicator people find
the feature unuseful or wanting it abolished. For example if voter
participation is equally low for Board or FESCo membership, do we
abolish the Board or FESCo?
I agree; we've decided release names, and held elections, for a long
time, without instituting the need to meet a specific threshold to
determine if we have enough votes or representation to make the vote
valid, statistically significant, or otherwise.
The only way to have some valid data points is, as was already
proposed, put "drop release names" as an entry for the next vote. I
fell it will be a fun vote :)
_______________________________________________
advisory-board mailing list
advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
