On 03/27/2012 12:18 AM, Robyn Bergeron wrote:
On 03/26/2012 04:46 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 03/26/2012 06:45 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
18 release name vote to find out if
there's a majority of (voting) contributors who would like the
release name
to simply go away.
Has it been looked into how many ( % ) of active contributors have
voted in the release naming process each given cycle?
Not necessarily in %, but the total number of votes cast is reported
with each set of election results.
--------------
The Fedora 17 release name is: Beefy Miracle
Voting period: Tuesday 2011-11-04 00:00:00 UTC to Monday 2011-10-10
23:59:59 UTC
Number of valid ballots cast: 292
------------
The Fedora 16 release name is: Verne
Voting period: Tuesday 2011-04-05 00:00:00 to Monday 2011-04-11 23:59:59
Number of valid ballots cast: 421
------------
The Fedora 15 release name is: Lovelock
Voting period: Tuesday 2010-10-26 00:00:00 to Monday 2010-11-01 23:59:59
Number of valid ballots cast: 296
-----------
The Fedora 14 release name is:
Laughlin
Following are the full election results.
* * *
Voting period: Tue 2010-05-04 00:00:01 - Mon 2010-05-10 00:00:01
Number of valid ballots cast: 206
-----------
......13 (Goddard) had 313 ballots, 12 (Constantine) had 393 ballots,
11 (Leonidas) had 310, 10 (Cambridge) had 390 ballots.
Interestingly, the results for F10 actually included the number of
users eligible to vote, in addition to the number of valid ballots
that were cast. I didn't see anything since then in any of the
announcements that reflected the eligible voter number.
I would think that before deciding anything you will have to know how
many community members actually bother/care enough to vote.
Certainly if you are about to add an voting option to drop the code
naming release process.
Unfortunately these [1] statistics dont seem to be up to date.
Infrastructure really needs to provide an graph for the project of both
new and active members.
Basically new user accounts created + number of logged in users
daily.weekly.monthly graph which kinda is necessary to determine the
project health status.
JBG
1.https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Statistics#Contributors
_______________________________________________
advisory-board mailing list
advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
